PinguProxy
PinguProxy
  • Tarifs
  • Blog
Se connecterCommencer

Contact

info@pinguproxy.com
Tous les systèmes sont opérationnels

Mentions légales

  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Politique relative aux cookies

Ressources

  • Outils gratuits
  • Intégrations
  • Emplacements de proxy
  • Comparatifs

Suivez-nous

XXTelegramTelegramDiscordDiscordInstagramInstagram

Moyens de paiement

StripeStripe
Credit & Debit CardsSatispayRevolut Pay
© 2026 PinguProxy. Tous droits réservés. P.IVA: 02776330397
CommencerEssai de 1 jours · Créez votre compte en quelques secondes
    Retour au blog

    Cet article est actuellement disponible uniquement en anglais.

    Lire en anglais
    Comparisonpythoncoding3 min de lecture

    Requests vs HTTPX: A Comprehensive Comparison in 2025

    IA
    Iacopo Bonandi
    17 janv. 2025, 23:00:00

    🔍 Introduction

    Python offers robust libraries for making HTTP requests, with requests and httpx standing out as two prominent choices. While requests has been the gold standard for years, httpx brings modern features and async capabilities. Let’s compare their features to help you decide which one is best for your project.


    ⚖️ Feature Comparison

    1. Synchronous Requests

    • Requests: The requests library is built specifically for synchronous HTTP operations. Its simple and intuitive API makes it ideal for straightforward tasks.

      import requests
      
      response = requests.get("https://example.com")
      print(response.text)
      
    • HTTPX: While httpx supports synchronous requests, its standout feature is the addition of asynchronous capabilities (discussed later).

      import httpx
      
      response = httpx.get("https://example.com")
      print(response.text)
      

    2. Asynchronous Requests

    • Requests: Does not support asynchronous HTTP calls. This limitation makes it less suitable for high-performance applications requiring concurrency.

    • HTTPX: Offers native support for asynchronous requests, allowing you to handle multiple HTTP calls concurrently.

      import httpx
      import asyncio
      
      async def fetch():
          async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
              response = await client.get("https://example.com")
              print(response.text)
      
      asyncio.run(fetch())
      

    3. HTTP/2 Support

    • Requests: Only supports HTTP/1.1. This may not be ideal for modern APIs that leverage HTTP/2’s performance improvements.

    • HTTPX: Natively supports HTTP/2, enabling faster, more efficient connections, especially for APIs with high traffic.

    4. Session Management

    • Requests: Provides sessions to persist parameters like cookies and headers across multiple requests. Session management is straightforward and effective for most use cases.

      session = requests.Session()
      session.headers.update({"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN"})
      response = session.get("https://example.com")
      
    • HTTPX: Similarly offers sessions (both synchronous and asynchronous). Additionally, httpx sessions can persist connection pools for better performance.

      session = httpx.Client()
      session.headers.update({"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN"})
      response = session.get("https://example.com")
      

    5. Extensibility

    • Requests: Features a rich ecosystem of plugins for advanced capabilities, such as retries and caching. However, some modern use cases may feel limited due to its synchronous-only nature.

    • HTTPX: Provides support for plugins and middleware-like behavior, enabling more extensible workflows. Examples include retry logic, authentication, and custom transports.

      class CustomAuth(httpx.Auth):
          def auth_flow(self, request):
              request.headers["Authorization"] = "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN"
              yield request
      
      client = httpx.Client(auth=CustomAuth())
      

    6. Performance

    • Requests: Performance is solid for synchronous operations but lacks concurrency and HTTP/2, which limits its throughput for high-demand applications.

    • HTTPX: Asynchronous support and HTTP/2 make httpx more performant for modern use cases, especially when handling multiple requests simultaneously.


    🛠️ Use Cases

    When to Use Requests:

    • Quick, synchronous scripts.
    • Applications with straightforward HTTP needs.
    • Projects where simplicity is a priority.

    When to Use HTTPX:

    • Applications requiring asynchronous requests.
    • APIs that benefit from HTTP/2.
    • High-performance systems with multiple concurrent connections.

    🏆 Conclusion

    While requests remains a dependable choice for many Python developers, httpx is the better option for modern, asynchronous, and high-performance applications. Evaluate your project’s requirements carefully to make the best choice.

    Are you ready to explore these libraries? Start coding and let us know which one works best for you!


    📚 Useful Resources

    • Requests Documentation
    • HTTPX Documentation
    • Asynchronous Programming in Python
    • Contact Support

    Thank you for choosing PinguProxy. Your success is our mission! 💙

    Normes éditoriales

    Dernière mise à jour :5 mars 2025

    Les articles PinguProxy sont rédigés et relus par notre équipe technique. Nous ne publions pas de placements payants et nos recommandations reflètent le comportement réel du produit sous charge. Vous avez trouvé une erreur ou souhaitez aller plus loin ? Écrivez à info@pinguproxy.com : nous mettrons l'article à jour et créditerons la correction.

    Contactez notre équipe via contact.

    Lectures associées

    Cas d'usageWeb ScrapingCas d'usageData for AICas d'usageSERP MonitoringPilierCompare proxy types (datacenter, mobile, residential, TOR)PilierPinguProxy plans & pricingPilierFree proxy & network tools (IP lookup, header checker, UA parser)PilierProxy setup guides for Python, Scrapy, Playwright, and morePilierResidential proxies by countryPilierPinguProxy vs Bright Data, Oxylabs, and other providers